Implementation / Policy Transition

Elaine Donnelly And Aaron Belkin Debate Dadt At Maxwell Air Force Base

Release Date: 
April 2, 2012
Press Contact: 
Indra Lusero, lusero@palmcenter.org, 303-902-9402

April 2, 2012 -- LOS ANGELES, CA -- In May, 2010, Palm Center director Aaron Belkin debated Elaine Donnelly, perhaps the leading opponent of DADT repeal, in front of 500 Air Force officers at the Air Command and Staff College (ACSC) in Alabama. The Air Force had planned to release the video of the debate, but the ACSC Commandant was unhappy with the session and did what he could to block its release. (You can see the ten rejection and delay notifications his office sent to the Palm Center here). At long last, Palm has managed to obtain a copy of the video, which we have posted on this page. For the full story of the debate and the video, see the March/April 2012 edition of OutServe Magazine.  read more »

Six months after repeal, military says DADT died quietly

Print Date: 
March 19, 2012
Source: 
Stars and Stripes
Author(s): 
Leo Shane III

See the original article at: http://www.stripes.com/news/special-reports/don-t-ask-don-t-tell/six-months-after-repeal-military-says-dadt-died-quietly-1.172070

WASHINGTON — Sgt. Pepe Johnson was surprised by the reaction he received when his fellow soldiers learned that he is gay.

“They’ve pretty much shrugged it off,” said Johnson, who rejoined the Army last fall after nearly a decade away. “Most of them were wondering why I had a nine-year gap in service. When I told them it was because of ‘don’t ask, don’t tell,’ they shrugged it off.

“That was a pleasant surprise.”

Six months after the military dropped the controversial “don’t ask, don’t tell” law barring gays from serving openly, Pentagon officials and gay rights advocates say the policy change has largely been a non-issue, with few complaints and no major headaches resulting from the new rules.

Pentagon spokeswoman Eileen Lainez said the repeal is “proceeding smoothly across the Department of Defense,” which officials there credit to the “enforcement of standards by our military leaders” and “servicemembers’ adherence to core values that include discipline and respect.”

Officials at the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a pro-repeal group which offers free legal assistance to troops on discrimination issues, said they’ve heard only a few minor complaints from military members about the implementation of the repeal.

“We had thought this would be largely a non-event, and that has been the case,” said Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the group. “I think the new regulations permitting gays and lesbians to serve are unambiguous, and the commands have all made it abundantly clear that this is the direction the force is going.”

Military leaders have seen pushback from conservative groups on some high-profile post-repeal stories — such as a picture of a gay Marine kissing his boyfriend which circulated earlier this month — but haven’t faced any lawsuits or mass resignations predicted by some opponents.

Last month’s White House dinner honoring Iraq War veterans included several same-sex couples among the invitees, but in their remarks military leaders didn’t even note that such a public display would have resulted in those troops’ dismissal just a few months earlier.

Johnson was booted out of the Army in 2003 under “don’t ask, don’t tell.” After he shared his secret with some friends, others in his unit started grilling them about his sexual orientation. Feeling pressure from both his friends and others, Johnson eventually came clean to his superiors.

As the political winds changed last year, Johnson said he was speaking with recruiters about returning even before the repeal went into effect last September.

“Their biggest issue was asking when I could start, not worrying about my personal life,” he said. “There has been no backlash, nothing to worry about.”

Repeal opponents remain skeptical. Elaine Donnelly, president of the conservative Center for Military Readiness, said plenty of troops remain opposed to serving with openly gay colleagues, but fear they’ll lose their job if they object to the military’s new pro-gay agenda.

“The entire administration … has imposed ‘zero tolerance’ policies against persons who are not enthusiastic supporters of LGBT law,” she said. “This is what we predicted, but the effects will not be seen quickly, especially in an election year.”

Much of the repeal fight has already shifted to the next rights battlefield, whether same-sex couples should receive the same housing and medical benefits as their straight peers.

Sarvis said the current benefits rules create two different classes of servicemembers. Opponents argue that the rights groups are trying to use the military to force radical social changes.

Meanwhile, Donnelly said that she has heard from a number of troops unhappy with the changes, who are simply waiting for their contracts to expire before leaving the service. That could cause major problems in coming months and years, she said.

Petty Officer 1st Class Jeremy Johnson, a member of active-duty gay-rights group OutServe, said he anticipates more problems in the future, although nothing to the extent of Donnelly’s predictions. Many of the gay troops he knows have not yet talked about their personal lives with their work colleagues, somewhat delaying the cultural impact of the repeal.

“This was never about having people come flying out of the closet,” he said. “It was about knowing you can’t be fired for being found out. There’s going to be a natural transition as more people become comfortable with the idea.”

Johnson, who was forced from the military in 2007, became the first openly gay person to re-enlist after the repeal was finalized. He said his commanders have warned him that he could be singled out for his public role, but so far it hasn’t caused any real conflicts.

“I anticipate that this isn’t over, but I don’t anticipate major problems, either,” he said.

shanel@stripes.osd.mil

Will Defenders of DADT Stand By Their Dire Predictions?

Release Date: 
December 22, 2011
Press Contact: 
Cathy Renna, 917-757-6123, cathy@rennacommunications.com
Image: 

Dr. Nathaniel Frank has posted a column on Huffington Post that includes a list of 60 predictions of disaster that DADT supporters said would occur after the repeal of the ban. The Palm Center is conducting a study on whether or not DADT repeal has undermined the military's cohesion and readiness; including embedding a scholar in military units and interviewing experts who predicted that repeal would lead to disaster to determine whether they believe that their forecasts were correct.  read more »

'Democracy Now' Interview with Aaron Belkin

Release Date: 
September 22, 2011
Press Contact: 
Cathy Renna, 917-757-6123, cathy@rennacommunications.com
Image: 

Democracy Now's Amy Goodman interviewed Aaron Belkin about DADT repeal earlier this week.  read more »

ON EVE OF DADT REPEAL, EXPERTS PREDICT SHARPLY DIVERGENT RESULTS

Sub-Heading: 
Some Anticipate a Non-Event While Others Expect Significant Problems
Release Date: 
September 18, 2011
Press Contact: 
Cathy Renna, 917-757-6123, cathy@rennacommunications.com
Image: 

LOS ANGELES (September 18, 2011) -- On the eve of the repeal of "don't ask, don't  tell," (DADT) predictions about the impact of the policy's demise diverge sharply.  On one hand, according to Professor Aaron Belkin, the repeal of DADT will be a non-event.  read more »

New Book on 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal Offers Lessons to the Left

Release Date: 
September 7, 2011
Press Contact: 
Cathy Renna, 917-757-6123, cathy@rennacommunications.com
Image: 

Huffington Post Media Group has announced that its second ebook release, due Sept. 20, will be Aaron Belkin's book on the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell": How We Won: Progressive Lessons from the Repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’ How We Won argues that lessons from the repeal campaign challenge some of the left’s most entrenched conventional wisdom about how to successfully set social policy.  read more »

How We Won - A Video Interview with Dr. Aaron Belkin

Release Date: 
August 15, 2011
Press Contact: 
Cathy Renna, 917-757-6123, cathy@rennacommunications.com

Palm Center funder, the Gill Foundation, produced this video about the critically important role the Palm Center played in building the case against Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT), and how that discriminatory policy was finally repealed.  read more »

PALM CENTER STATEMENT ON FULL CERTIFICATION OF DOD DADT REPEAL READINESS

Release Date: 
July 22, 2011
Press Contact: 
Cathy Renna, 917-757-6123, cathy@rennacommunications.com
Image: 

LOS ANGELES (July 22, 2011) -- The following statement can be attributed to Palm Center Director Aaron Belkin:

"Today's full certification of the repeal of 'don't ask don't tell' by President Obama, Secretary Panetta and Chairman Mullen gives us a concrete date - September 20, 2011 - that will go down in history as the day when gay and lesbian service members end their silence and step forward to serve this country openly..." (more)

   read more »

EXPERTS: PENTAGON DADT CERTIFICATION CONTAINS GLOBAL MESSAGE

Sub-Heading: 
Military Brass Confirm that Repeal of Gay Ban is No Big Deal
Release Date: 
July 22, 2011
Press Contact: 
Cathy Renna, 917-757-6123, cathy@rennacommunications.com
Image: 

LOS ANGELES (July 22, 2011) -- Palm Center Director Aaron Belkin released the following statement today on the imminent certification by the Secretary of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that the Pentagon is ready for the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell."  read more »

Palm Center Statement on DoD Suspension of DADT Discharges

Release Date: 
July 8, 2011
Press Contact: 
Cathy Renna, 917-757-6123, cathy@rennacommunications.com
Image: 

LOS ANGELES (July 8, 2011) - In response to today's Army Times announcement that the Pentagon has suspended discharges under "don't ask, don't tell", the following can be attributed to Palm Center Director Aaron Belkin:

"The Pentagon is lawfully and properly responding to a federal court's ruling, and today's news may bring some relief to gay and lesbian service members who continue to fear that they could be fired for who they are."  read more »

Syndicate content