Source: Zogby International
Publication Date:
December 2006
John Zogby, John Bruce, Rebecca Wittman, and Sam Rodgers.
Please click here to download this document as a PDF.
John Zogby, President and CEO
John Bruce, Vice President and Systems
Administrator
Rebecca Wittman, Vice President and Managing Editor
Sam Rodgers, Writer
December, 2006
© 2006 Zogby
International
Table Of Contents
Subject
Page
I. Methodology and Sample
Characteristics
2
II. Executive
Summary
5
III. Narrative
Analysis
8
Tables
1. Intra-Unit Leadership And Cooperation
12
2. Impact Of Gay/Lesbian Presence On
Unit
Morale
17
3. Assumed Impact Of
Gay/
Lesbian Presence On Unit Morale
18
4. Arguments For Keeping Gays/Lesbians From Serving
23
5. Arguments For Allowing Gays/Lesbians To Serve
24
I. Methodology and Sample
Characteristics
Methodology
Zogby International conducted
online interviews of 545 U.S. Military Personnel who
have served in Iraq and Afghanistan (or in combat
support roles directly supporting those operations),
from a purchased list of U.S. Military Personnel. The
online poll ran from 10/24/06 through
10/26/06.
The margin of error is +/- 4.3 percentage points.
Margins of error are higher in sub-groups. Slight
weights were added to age and race to more accurately
reflect the population. Data used in weighting
was obtained from official Department of Defense (DOD)
resources.
The panel used for this survey
is composed of over 1 million members and correlates
closely with the U.S. population on all key
profiles.
The panel uses a double opt-in format through an
invitation only method. Panelists are sourced
through a variety of commercial enterprises and all
recruitment methodologies fully comply with CASRO
guidelines.
Each panelist is defined by over 400 variables,
therefore making the panel highly segmented and fully
representative of the US and military
population.
|
Sample
Characteristics
|
Frequency
|
Valid
Percent*
|
|
Sample size
|
545
|
100
|
|
East
|
69
|
13
|
|
South
|
223
|
43
|
|
Central/Great Lakes
|
101
|
20
|
|
West
|
123
|
24
|
|
Did not answer state
|
29
|
--
|
|
Veteran
|
88
|
16
|
|
Active
|
353
|
65
|
|
Reserve/Guard,
mobilized
|
35
|
6
|
|
|
69
|
13
|
|
Air Force
|
160
|
29
|
|
Army
|
251
|
46
|
|
Marines
|
35
|
7
|
|
Navy
|
92
|
17
|
|
Coast Guard
|
5
|
1
|
|
18-29
|
296
|
55
|
|
30-49
|
221
|
41
|
|
50-64
|
22
|
4
|
|
Did not answer age
|
6
|
--
|
|
White
|
375
|
73
|
|
Black/African
American
|
62
|
12
|
|
Spanish/Hispanic/Latino
|
47
|
9
|
|
American
Indian/Alaska Native
|
5
|
1
|
|
Asian
|
13
|
3
|
|
Hawaiian/Pacific
Islander
|
5
|
1
|
|
Other/Mixed
|
10
|
2
|
|
Did not
answer race
|
28
|
--
|
|
Baptist
|
85
|
17
|
|
Church
of
Christ
|
22
|
4
|
|
Episcopal
|
6
|
1
|
|
Sample Characteristics
(continued)
|
Frequency
|
Valid
Percent*
|
|
Jewish
|
6
|
1
|
|
Lutheran
|
35
|
7
|
|
Methodist
|
26
|
5
|
|
Mormon
|
6
|
1
|
|
Muslim
|
5
|
1
|
|
Pentecostal
|
16
|
3
|
|
Presbyterian
|
11
|
2
|
|
Roman Catholic
|
148
|
29
|
|
Seventh Day Adventist
|
1
|
0
|
|
Atheist/Realist/Humanist
|
17
|
4
|
|
Other/no affiliation
|
120
|
24
|
|
Did not answer
religion
|
36
|
--
|
|
Democratic
|
101
|
21
|
|
Republican
|
241
|
51
|
|
Independent/Minor
party
|
103
|
22
|
|
Not sure of party
|
32
|
7
|
|
Did not answer party
|
68
|
--
|
|
Male
|
451
|
85
|
|
Female
|
80
|
15
|
|
Did not answer gender
|
15
|
--
|
* Numbers have
been rounded to the nearest percent and might not total
100.
II.
Executive Summary
This survey of current and
recent military service personnel who have served in
Iraq or Afghanistan (or in combat support roles directly
supporting those operations) sought to explore the issue
of sexual minorities in the United States military,
specifically within the context of three key areas
– the size and characteristics of the gay and
lesbian population in the military, the views of service
personnel regarding the subject, and finally, the impact
of gays and lesbians on the military.
Population Within Service
Unit
By interviewing military
personnel who have served in Iraq or Afghanistan (both
those who have served and are serving currently), we
were able to capture a snapshot of the current military
environment with respect to this issue. Our survey included
respondents from all service branches as well as Active
Duty Personnel, Veterans and Reservists. The sample also
included combat and non-combat units as well as enlisted
men and officers.
The overall attitude of these
service members was optimistic. Large majorities report
being well-trained, well-equipped and battle
ready.
Additionally, most respondents believe that their
leadership (both Non-Commissioned Officers and
Commissioned Officers) was excellent and they report
feeling a high level of teamwork exists within their
unit.
Regarding the presence of gays
and lesbians in their units, a near majority (45%)
states that they suspect a member of
their unit is homosexual. Roughly one-third (31%)
does not suspect a member of their unit. Higher rates of
suspicion were found among Reservists (60%), Navy
Personnel (59%) and Females (56%). The lowest rates were
found among Air Force Personnel (38%) and Officers
(33%). When
asked how many unit members they suspected, two-thirds
of respondents (68%) said less than three.
Respondents were also asked if
the knew of
any members within their unit who were gay or
lesbian.
Here, less than one quarter (23%) said they were
definitely aware. Of those who were,
three-in-five (59%) report having been directly told by
the individual. When asked how many
they knew
within their unit, the vast majority (75%) reported
knowing two or less. A majority (55%)
also notes that the presence of gays and lesbians is
well-known within their unit.
Opinions On Homosexuality
Asked whether they agree that
gays and lesbians should be allowed to serve in the
military, respondents were closely split with a
plurality (37%) disagreeing with the idea, and 26
percent agreeing they should be allowed.
Of those agreeing with their inclusion, certain demographic
groups represented higher than average
support.
Among those were Independents, African-Americans,
Women, those aged 25-34, and Women. These subgroups were
largely more supportive of gays and lesbians in every
question, with Democrats and Hispanics also
frequently representing more open views toward gays
in the military.
Within military subgroups, veterans and those having served
less than 4 years were also more likely to support the idea
of inclusion within the military, while Active Duty
Personnel, Officers, and those having served 15 or more
years were less likely to agree. There was slight variance
among service branches, and this variance has been noted
where applicable.
Three-quarters of those surveyed stated that they felt
comfortable around gays and lesbians and four-in-five (78%)
noted that they would join the military regardless of their
open inclusion.
Additionally, a majority (52%) reports having received some
form of anti-gay harassment training, with Air Force
personnel representing the highest level of training (62%)
and the Marine Corps the lowest (34%).
Perceived Impact
Of those who were certain that a member of their unit was
gay or lesbian, two-thirds did not believe that their
presence created an impact on either their personal morale
(66%) or the morale of their unit (64%). Approximately one-quarter
of that group believed there to be a negative impact to
both.
In contrast, of those who do
not suspect the presence of gays or lesbians within
their unit, only half (49%) perceive no impact on
personal morale, and only less than one-third (26%) feel
there would be no impact on their unit’s
morale.
Regarding their unit’s morale, a majority of this
group (58%) believes if there were gays or lesbians
within their unit, there would be a negative
impact.
Given a set of arguments both
for and against allowing gays in the military,
respondents were asked to choose those that were the
strongest.
The most widely selected arguments for keeping gays and
lesbians from serving centered on the threat of their
presence undermining the unit (40%) or the threat of
harm befalling them (28%).
When given the arguments in
support of allowing their inclusion, the two most
selected arguments were the irrelevance of sexual
orientation to job performance (39%) and the morality of
discriminating based on sexual orientation (30%).
Additionally, one-in-five respondents (21%) believed
there to be no strong arguments for the exclusion of
homosexuals, while one-in-five (19%) believe there to be
no strong arguments in their favor.
Overall, this survey paints a
mixed picture for the future of gays and lesbians in the
military.
While overwhelming majorities of those responding
display tolerance and understanding of the rights and
issues involved in the argument, there are still large
obstacles that must be overcome.
III.
Narrative Analysis
1. What is your current status?
|
Active
|
65%
|
|
Veteran
|
16
|
|
Reserve/Guard,
non-mobilized
|
13
|
|
Reserve/Guard, mobilized
|
6
|
A majority of those surveyed (65%) indicated that they were
currently classified as Active Duty. Almost one-in-five (19%)
identified themselves as being in the Reserves – 13
percent non-mobilized, 6 percent
mobilized.
The reaming 16 percent noted their status as
Veterans.
2. In which branch of the
military do you serve? (Vets: In which branch of the
military did you serve?)
|
Army
|
46%
|
|
Air Force
|
29
|
|
Navy
|
17
|
|
Marines
|
|